AllinAllSpace  ·  Markets allinallspace.com
Markets

5 Under-the-Radar ETFs for Long-Term Investors

Five ETFs you have probably never read about — and one of them returned 104% in the past year. From small-cap value to disruptive materials to tech momentum, here is what the headlines are missing.

MARKETS

Five ETFs you have probably never read about — and one of them returned 104% in the past year. From small-cap value to disruptive materials to tech momentum, here is what the headlines are missing.

ByAllinAllSpacePublishedJuly 19, 2026CategoryMarkets
Markets · ETFs · July 2026

The most talked-about ETFs are rarely the most interesting ones. SPY, QQQ, VTI — they dominate the conversation precisely because they are safe, familiar, and large. The ETF universe has over 3,000 funds. Most investors know about fifteen of them.

This is not a list of moonshots. These are five funds with real strategies, real track records, and in most cases, real outperformance — just without the column inches. They span value, dividends, critical materials, energy, and tech momentum. The only thing they have in common is that your average investor has probably not noticed them.

Important Past performance does not guarantee future results. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security. All data correct as of July 2026.

1. AVUV — Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF

TickerAVUV
IssuerAvantis Investors
Expense Ratio0.25%
AUM~$27B
1-Year Return+38.8%
Since Inception (2019)16.3% p.a.

The academic case for small-cap value investing has existed for decades. The practical case — that you can actually access it cheaply and consistently — is newer, and AVUV is one of the best arguments for it.

Avantis launched this fund in 2019 with a simple mandate: buy U.S. small-cap companies that are cheap relative to their book value and profitable. Not just cheap, not just profitable — both, simultaneously. That screen eliminates the value traps (cheap but broken businesses) that give value investing a bad reputation. The result is a 799-stock portfolio where the top 10 holdings account for just 8.6% of the fund — genuinely diversified, not index-hugging.

From 2020 to 2024, AVUV was largely ignored. Large-cap tech dominated everything, and small-cap value looked like a relic. Then 2025 happened, and the rotation that many investors had been predicting for years actually materialised. AVUV returned 38.8% over the past twelve months (you can track where it currently sits relative to its 52-week range on our 52-Week High/Low Scanner) — while most of the people talking about outperformance were still debating Nvidia’s price-to-earnings ratio. At 0.25%, it costs less than most actively managed funds and more than the cheapest passive options. For what it delivers, it is not expensive.

What to Watch Small-cap value underperforms during speculative rallies driven by high-growth, unprofitable companies. AVUV is a long-term position, not a trade. It has historically had sharper drawdowns than the S&P 500 during risk-off periods.

2. SCHD — Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

TickerSCHD
IssuerCharles Schwab
Expense Ratio0.06%
AUM$95B
1-Year Return+28.2%
Dividend Yield~3.5%

SCHD is perhaps the least obscure fund on this list — $95 billion in assets is hard to call under-the-radar. But it spent three years being dismissed as a dinosaur in a market that only cared about growth, and the dismissal was wrong.

The fund tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, which has a strict entry requirement: companies must have paid dividends for at least ten consecutive years, and they are ranked by a composite score of cash flow to debt, return on equity, dividend yield, and five-year dividend growth rate. The result is a portfolio of mature, profitable companies that actually earn their dividends rather than borrowing to pay them.

From 2022 to 2024, SCHD badly underperformed. The annual reconstitution in late 2024 loaded it up with energy and consumer staples — a move that looked wrong at the time and turned out to be exactly right. The 2026 rotation away from tech has been SCHD’s moment. A 28.2% one-year return alongside a 3.5% dividend yield makes this one of the most quietly productive large-value funds in the market. And at 0.06% — six dollars a year on a $10,000 investment — the fee is almost insultingly low.

At 0.06%, SCHD charges less than most funds spend on paperwork. For what it delivers, that is not a fee. It is a rounding error.

3. DMAT — Global X Disruptive Materials ETF

TickerDMAT
IssuerGlobal X
Expense Ratio0.59%
AUM<$100M
2025 Return+105%
Category Outperformance+20%

While most AI investors were buying Nvidia and Microsoft, DMAT was quietly buying the materials that make all of it possible. The fund tracks companies that produce the physical ingredients of disruptive technology — rare earths, copper, lithium, cobalt, and other critical materials that go into semiconductors, EV batteries, and clean energy infrastructure.

The index methodology requires at least 50% of revenues from these categories, which keeps it honest. It also flags companies just below that threshold as pre-revenue candidates — essentially a watch list baked into the fund’s construction. In 2025, DMAT returned 105%, outperforming its category average by more than 20 percentage points. It did this while remaining below $100M in AUM, which means most institutional investors have not touched it.

The case here is structural rather than cyclical. The world is building an enormous amount of AI infrastructure, renewable energy capacity, and electrified transportation. All of it needs materials that are currently in limited supply and concentrated in a small number of geographies. DMAT is a bet that the physical supply chain matters as much as the software layer — and that it is currently undervalued relative to the companies building on top of it. The 0.59% expense ratio is on the higher end, and single-theme concentration means this is a volatile fund. But as a small satellite position within a broader portfolio, the logic is coherent.

4. XOP — SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF

TickerXOP
IssuerState Street / SPDR
Expense Ratio0.35%
FocusUpstream E&P
WeightingEqual Weight
2026 PerformanceOutperforming S&P

Most energy ETFs spread exposure across the entire oil and gas value chain — production, transportation, refining, retail. XOP does not. It owns exclusively upstream exploration and production companies: the businesses that find oil and gas and pull it out of the ground. That single-minded focus makes it a much purer expression of commodity price exposure than a diversified energy fund.

The equal-weight methodology is the other distinguishing feature. Rather than concentrating in the largest E&P companies — ExxonMobil, Chevron — XOP gives meaningful weight to mid-size and smaller producers. That amplifies the fund’s sensitivity to commodity prices in both directions: larger gains when oil is rising, larger losses when it falls. In 2026, with the market rotating away from tech and towards energy and defensive names as part of a broader de-rating of growth stocks, XOP has been one of the cleaner ways to ride that shift without picking individual companies.

This is an explicitly cyclical fund. It belongs in a portfolio as a tactical allocation when the energy cycle is working, not as a permanent core holding. The 0.35% fee is reasonable for a sector ETF.

5. PTF — Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF

TickerPTF
IssuerInvesco
Expense Ratio0.60%
StrategyRelative Strength
1-Year Return+104%
Large-Cap Exposure~65%

PTF does not try to identify the best technology companies. It owns the ones that are already winning, as measured by price momentum relative to their peers. The Dorsey Wright methodology ranks tech stocks by relative strength — how well each company’s share price is performing against others in the sector — and builds a portfolio of the current leaders. When leadership changes, the portfolio changes with it.

This is a fundamentally different philosophy from most tech ETFs, which are market-cap weighted and therefore permanently heavy in whatever became large in the past. PTF is heavy in whatever is large right now, with a mechanism to rotate away as momentum fades. About 65% of the portfolio sits in large-cap names, but the composition shifts as the momentum rankings update. The result has been a 104% one-year return that almost nobody is writing about, because PTF’s AUM remains modest and it does not fit neatly into the standard tech ETF narrative.

The risks are real. Momentum strategies can reverse sharply when market leadership rotates — the same mechanism that drives outperformance in trending markets creates rapid drawdowns when trends reverse. At 0.60% it is the most expensive fund on this list. And the strategy requires genuine acceptance that you are following price rather than making a fundamental judgment. But as a complement to a broader tech or growth position, PTF’s disciplined approach has a logic that simple market-cap weighting cannot replicate.

The Short Version

Five funds, five different ideas. AVUV and SCHD are long-term compounders — the kind of positions you build slowly and hold for years. DMAT is a concentrated bet on the physical infrastructure of the tech economy. XOP is a cyclical energy play for investors who think the rotation has further to run. PTF is the odd one out: a momentum strategy that has delivered extraordinary returns by following price rather than story.

None of them are suitable for everyone. All of them are more interesting than the fifteenth article you have read about the S&P 500 this month.

For live market data, see our Market Watchlist. For broader investment coverage and savings guides, visit our Investing & Savings section.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. AllinAllSpace is not a registered investment advisor. All ETF data sourced from ETF Database, Seeking Alpha, PortfoliosLab, and fund issuer filings, correct as of July 2026. ETF returns include dividends where applicable. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

← Previous “The Best Currency Is No Currency” — Inside Argentina’s Peso Experiment